0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.35	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.13/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.13/0.35	% WCLimit    : 180
0.13/0.35	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:58:24 EDT 2024
0.13/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.22/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.22/0.54	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p
1.40/0.73	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
1.40/0.73	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA.
1.40/0.73	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting sh4 with 180s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# lpo5_fix with pid 28286 completed with status 0
1.40/0.73	# Result found by lpo5_fix
1.40/0.73	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA.
1.40/0.73	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores
1.40/0.73	# No SInE strategy applied
1.40/0.73	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBC
1.40/0.73	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
1.40/0.73	# Starting ehoh_best4 with 437s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo5_fix with 91s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting sh1 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting new_bool_8 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# new_bool_8 with pid 28299 completed with status 0
1.40/0.73	# Result found by new_bool_8
1.40/0.73	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA.
1.40/0.73	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores
1.40/0.73	# No SInE strategy applied
1.40/0.73	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBC
1.40/0.73	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
1.40/0.73	# Starting ehoh_best4 with 437s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting lpo5_fix with 91s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting sh1 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Starting new_bool_8 with 82s (1) cores
1.40/0.73	# Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
1.40/0.73	# Presaturation interreduction done
1.40/0.73	
1.40/0.73	# Proof found!
1.40/0.73	# SZS status Theorem
1.40/0.73	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_sort2, type, type_Mirabelle_typ: $tType).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_sort3, type, set_nat: $tType).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_sort4, type, type_M1694694083scheme: $tType).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_50, type, bot_bot_set_nat: set_nat).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_55, type, insert_nat: nat > set_nat > set_nat).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_62, type, type_M1006385707scheme: type_Mirabelle_typ > type_M1694694083scheme).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_78, type, type_M876316792e_FVar: nat > type_M1694694083scheme).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_88, type, type_M1690910139scheme: (nat > type_Mirabelle_typ) > type_M1694694083scheme > type_M1694694083scheme).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_105, type, type_M1050318637scheme: type_M1694694083scheme > set_nat).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_106, type, member_nat: nat > set_nat > $o).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_107, type, s1: nat > type_Mirabelle_typ).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_108, type, s2: nat > type_Mirabelle_typ).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_109, type, n: nat).
1.40/0.73	thf(decl_110, type, x: nat).
1.40/0.73	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (~((member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))))|((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n))|((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p', conj_0)).
1.40/0.73	thf(fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X1:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X27:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X27))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X1 @ X27)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p', fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)).
1.40/0.73	thf(fact_35_mk__scheme__injective, axiom, ![X82:type_Mirabelle_typ, X384:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((type_M1006385707scheme @ X82)=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X384))=>((X82)=(X384)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p', fact_35_mk__scheme__injective)).
1.40/0.73	thf(fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X19:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X19))=(insert_nat @ X19 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p', fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)).
1.40/0.73	thf(fact_89_singleton__iff, axiom, ![X25:nat, X104:nat]:(((member_nat @ X25 @ (insert_nat @ X104 @ bot_bot_set_nat))<=>((X25)=(X104)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4JORNUQzgb/E---3.1_28203.p', fact_89_singleton__iff)).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((~(member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))|((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n))|((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))&((s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n)))&((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1823:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X1824:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X1823 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X1824))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X1823 @ X1824)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X2256:type_Mirabelle_typ, X2257:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((type_M1006385707scheme @ X2256)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X2257))|((X2256)=(X2257)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_35_mk__scheme__injective])])])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X6:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X6))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X1 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1671:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X1671))=(insert_nat @ X1671 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X67:type_Mirabelle_typ, X68:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((X67)=(X68))|((type_M1006385707scheme @ X67)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X68)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((type_M1006385707scheme @ (s1 @ x))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ x))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_10])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1834:nat, X1835:nat]:(((~(member_nat @ X1834 @ (insert_nat @ X1835 @ bot_bot_set_nat))|((X1834)=(X1835)))&(((X1834)!=(X1835))|(member_nat @ X1834 @ (insert_nat @ X1835 @ bot_bot_set_nat))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_89_singleton__iff])])])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X6:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X6))=(insert_nat @ X6 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X67:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((X67)=(s1 @ x))|((type_M1006385707scheme @ X67)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ x))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X6:nat, X8:nat]:((((X6)=(X8))|~((member_nat @ X6 @ (insert_nat @ X8 @ bot_bot_set_nat))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (member_nat @ n @ (insert_nat @ x @ bot_bot_set_nat)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((s1 @ x)=(s2 @ x)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((x)=(n)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ((s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
1.40/0.73	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_21]), c_0_22]), ['proof']).
1.40/0.73	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
1.40/0.73	# Parsed axioms                        : 463
1.40/0.73	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
1.40/0.73	# Initial clauses                      : 902
1.40/0.73	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 134
1.40/0.73	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 768
1.40/0.73	# Processed clauses                    : 1003
1.40/0.73	# ...of these trivial                  : 8
1.40/0.73	# ...subsumed                          : 130
1.40/0.73	# ...remaining for further processing  : 865
1.40/0.73	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 138
1.40/0.73	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
1.40/0.73	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
1.40/0.73	# Backward-rewritten                   : 14
1.40/0.73	# Generated clauses                    : 195
1.40/0.73	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 160
1.40/0.73	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
1.40/0.73	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
1.40/0.73	# Paramodulations                      : 48
1.40/0.73	# Factorizations                       : 0
1.40/0.73	# NegExts                              : 5
1.40/0.73	# Equation resolutions                 : 143
1.40/0.73	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
1.40/0.73	# Total rewrite steps                  : 62
1.40/0.73	# ...of those cached                   : 32
1.40/0.73	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional check models        : 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
1.40/0.73	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
1.40/0.73	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
1.40/0.73	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
1.40/0.73	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
1.40/0.73	# Current number of processed clauses  : 124
1.40/0.73	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 55
1.40/0.73	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
1.40/0.73	#    Negative unit clauses             : 23
1.40/0.73	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 46
1.40/0.73	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 540
1.40/0.73	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1571
1.40/0.73	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
1.40/0.73	# Current number of archived clauses   : 633
1.40/0.73	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 66548
1.40/0.73	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37865
1.40/0.73	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 93
1.40/0.73	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 946
1.40/0.73	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
1.40/0.73	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 58
1.40/0.73	# BW rewrite match successes           : 33
1.40/0.73	# Condensation attempts                : 0
1.40/0.73	# Condensation successes               : 0
1.40/0.73	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 67654
1.40/0.73	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 17405
1.40/0.73	
1.40/0.73	# -------------------------------------------------
1.40/0.73	# User time                : 0.132 s
1.40/0.73	# System time              : 0.017 s
1.40/0.73	# Total time               : 0.149 s
1.40/0.73	# Maximum resident set size: 6132 pages
1.40/0.73	
1.40/0.73	# -------------------------------------------------
1.40/0.73	# User time                : 0.477 s
1.40/0.73	# System time              : 0.057 s
1.40/0.73	# Total time               : 0.534 s
1.40/0.73	# Maximum resident set size: 2716 pages
1.40/0.73	% E---3.1 exiting
1.40/0.73	% E exiting
1.40/0.73	EOF